Jan 15
Why is Comcast's onscreen guide user interface so awful?
By William Levins
If the reason everyone upgraded to High-Def is for better graphics
and more screen detail...then why is Comcast's onscreen guide and info
panels and menu so ugly and awful? The graphics and text look like
they're from 8-bit video games circa 1980's...
I'm a late upgrade to HD TV, but I'm astounded how awful Comcast's User Interface appears
My home has utilized Comcast for internet and television for
years...there's really no choice, they're a monopoly in this area...but I
was never motivated to upgrade to their HD offerings. Well until we
were forced to when they switched to all digital signals. My gripes and
issues with this transition and the requirement I string digital cables
boxes off all my high-end, new flat screen tvs...well that's a different
rant. But what's really struck me about the new HD TV isn't the detail
and the colors...hell if I take off my glasses it's all blurry to me
anyway....but it's just how bad, low-tech, and downright backward
looking Comcast's Guide, menu, and info panels are considering how much
potential exists.
AppleTV versus Comcast's Guide
I've had an AppleTV first generation for a while. And though I've
got some complaints about it's user interface, at least it makes use of
high-resolution graphics and clear, readable text. It functions better.
It looks better. And it's far more readable. Compared to Comcast's Guide
and Menus it's night and day. Sure it could be argued that the AppleTV
and Comcast's cable box serve different purposes (if you're not
comparing Comcast OnDemand) but since most people interact daily with
Comcast's onscreen guide...shouldn't it be much, much better. Let's take
a look at it.
Comcast's
onscreen guide displays pixelated text that looks like it's 8-bit type
from an old Nintendo game. The graphics and coloring is clunky and
unappealing. Titles are chopped off, scrolling, and paging through the
interface is also awkward and difficult. It's just awful. And I've found
the "info" provided is often inadequate and less than helpful.
The
opposite of Comcast's bad UI is the AppleTV user interface. Visually
compelling - the interface is organized and quick to navigate. Text is
crisp and clean and easily read from a distance (even if you take your
glasses off). And choices and options are apparent and easy to choose.
Even
if you argue they're serving different purposes (as I've already
admitted) the obvious differences are glaring. The text is my biggest
gripe. Why does the Comcast UI use such badly rendered text when it's
displaying on my big, beautiful HD flat screen? And it's not like
Comcast doesn't know there's an HD TV connected...Comcast forced me to get
the digital HD boxes for them. So why can't they utlitize HD graphics
and nicely rendered text? Why does the guide look like it's from the
early 80's?
With all the processing power and
graphic capabilities inherent in today's set-top boxes and HD
televisions...shouldn't Comcast do more and do better when presenting
their 100s of channels. It's almost a requirement to use the guide since
you have so many programming options - it'd take you all day to manually click
through them. Comcast should devote more attention and design-time to their
onscreen guide. It should adhere to all modern day User Interface
guidelines and it should be high definition.
What
the Comcast onscreen guide should not be is almost anything but what it currently is - an
anachronistic example of bad text rendering and bad UI design. I believe
that Comcast is missing a big opportunity to improve the usability of
their TV offering. And to improve their brand image in a substantive
manner (more so than running away from their negative reputation by rebranding to
Xfinity). Concentrating on the usability of an element that touches and
effects users daily lives would go much further to improving the customer Comcast relationship. After branding
lurks in the little details. And in its current state, the Comcast
onscreen guide is a big branding and user interface negative. One with big potential that will sadly, probably remain neglected by Comcast.


